Home/Guides/HL7 FHIR Migration
HL7 v2/v3 to FHIR R4/R5 Migration

Automated HL7 to FHIR Data Migration

Convert HL7 v2/v3 messages to FHIR R4/R5 with 95% automated conversion, complete semantic mapping, and full interoperability. Complete migration in 3-5 weeks with 75% cost savings.

95%
Automated Conversion
3-5 Weeks
vs 6-12 Months
75%
Cost Savings
100%
FHIR Compliant

Complete HL7 to FHIR Conversion Coverage

HL7 v2 MessageFHIR R4/R5 ResourceConversion Rate
ADT (Admit/Discharge/Transfer)Patient, Encounter, Location98%
ORM/OBR (Orders)ServiceRequest, DiagnosticReport96%
ORU (Results)Observation, DiagnosticReport97%
MDM (Medical Documents)DocumentReference, Composition94%
RDE/RDS (Pharmacy)MedicationRequest, MedicationDispense95%
SIU (Scheduling)Appointment, Schedule93%
DFT (Financial)Claim, ChargeItem, Invoice92%
VXU (Immunization)Immunization, ImmunizationEvaluation96%

Comprehensive Semantic Mapping

AI-powered semantic mapping handles complex HL7 to FHIR conversions including:

  • • Custom Z-segments to FHIR extensions
  • • Code system translation (ICD-9/10, LOINC, SNOMED)
  • • Date/time format standardization
  • • Identifier system mapping
  • • Reference resolution and linking
  • • Cardinality and optionality handling

4-Phase HL7 to FHIR Migration Process

1

HL7 Message Analysis (Week 1)

  • Automated HL7 v2/v3 message profiling
  • Custom Z-segment identification
  • Code system inventory (ICD, LOINC, SNOMED)
  • Interface and integration mapping
2

FHIR Mapping Generation (Week 2)

  • AI-generated FHIR StructureMap resources
  • Custom extension definitions for Z-segments
  • ConceptMap for code system translation
  • FHIR validation profile creation
3

Automated Conversion (Weeks 3-4)

  • Bulk HL7 message to FHIR resource conversion
  • Real-time FHIR validation against profiles
  • Reference resolution and bundle creation
  • Parallel processing (10K+ messages/minute)
4

Validation & Integration (Week 5)

  • FHIR server validation and testing
  • Clinical workflow compatibility testing
  • SMART on FHIR app integration
  • Interoperability testing with external systems

FHIR Interoperability Benefits

Modern API Access

  • • RESTful API with JSON/XML support
  • • OAuth 2.0 and SMART on FHIR security
  • • GraphQL query support
  • • Real-time subscriptions and webhooks

Standards Compliance

  • • FHIR R4/R5 specification compliance
  • • US Core Implementation Guide support
  • • USCDI v3/v4 data element coverage
  • • ONC Cures Act Final Rule compliance

Enhanced Interoperability

  • • Patient data portability (Blue Button 2.0)
  • • Provider directory integration
  • • Clinical decision support hooks
  • • Population health analytics

Cost Reduction

  • • 80% reduction in interface maintenance
  • • Eliminate custom HL7 interface engines
  • • Faster third-party app integration
  • • Reduced vendor lock-in

People Also Ask

What is the difference between HL7 v2 and FHIR?

HL7 v2 uses pipe-delimited messages for point-to-point integration, while FHIR uses modern RESTful APIs with JSON/XML for flexible, web-based interoperability. FHIR provides granular resource-based access, standardized data models, and better support for mobile/cloud applications. FHIR is the future of healthcare interoperability mandated by ONC regulations.

How are custom Z-segments converted to FHIR?

Custom Z-segments are converted to FHIR extensions with proper structure definitions. AI analyzes Z-segment usage patterns, generates appropriate extension definitions, and creates StructureMap resources for automated conversion. Extensions maintain semantic meaning while ensuring FHIR compliance and interoperability.

Can you maintain both HL7 and FHIR during transition?

Yes, dual-protocol support allows gradual migration. The system maintains HL7 v2 interfaces for legacy systems while exposing FHIR APIs for modern applications. Bidirectional synchronization ensures data consistency. This phased approach minimizes disruption and allows testing before full FHIR cutover.

Is FHIR migration required for ONC Cures Act compliance?

Yes, the ONC Cures Act Final Rule requires certified EHR systems to support FHIR-based APIs for patient access (21st Century Cures Act). Healthcare organizations must provide patients with API access to their health data using FHIR R4 and US Core profiles. Non-compliance can result in information blocking penalties.

What FHIR version should I migrate to?

FHIR R4 is the current standard for production use, with widespread EHR vendor support and regulatory requirements (ONC, CMS). FHIR R5 offers enhanced features but has limited vendor adoption. We recommend FHIR R4 with US Core 6.1.0 profiles for maximum interoperability and compliance with current regulations.

Ready to Migrate to FHIR?

Schedule a free assessment to learn how AI can convert your HL7 v2/v3 messages to FHIR R4/R5 with 95% automation and 75% cost savings.